Saudi Aramco has enlisted help from foreign companies to search for gas, including joint ventures with Royal Dutch Shell Plc, OAO Lukoil, China Petroleum and Chemical Corp., and Eni SpA and Repsol YPF SA. The four ventures completed 18 of 27 exploration wells in 2008, and four of the remaining wells were being drilled at the end of year, Aramco said.
The kingdom plans to boost gas-processing capacity to 12.5 billion cubic feet a day from 9.3 billion, according to Aramco.
The Khursaniyah gas plant will have a processing capacity of 1 billion cubic feet a day when it is completed mid-year. The plant will be able to produce 560 million cubic feet a day of sales gas and 280,000 barrels a day of ethane and natural gas liquids, Aramco said.
Obama’s White House mounts a campaign to sustain the unsustainable in the economic realm. Everything they’ve done for four months involving money management and enterprise policy — from backstopping hopeless banks, to gaming the bankruptcies of the big car companies, to the bungled efforts to prop up artificially-high house prices — amounts to a gigantic exercise in futility. Worse, it gives off odors of dishonesty or stupidity, since the ominous tendings of our system are so starkly self-evident…
Not least of the problems entailed in all this are the scary political consequences. It’s one thing for a business such as a bank to fail; its another thing for the public to lose confidence in banking, or their own currency, or the credibility of all the people who work in banking, or the authority of those charged to regulate these activities, or the courts and their officers who are supposed to adjudicate misconduct in them. When faith in all these things starts to go, all bets are off for even larger social constructs like democracy, justice, and the destiny of a federal republic
America is the most bankrupt nation on Earth. Our government is for the nonce relatively solvent, its AAA rating intact…
Our leniency toward those with unsustainable debts helps not only profligate debtors, but the rest of us as well. Less onerous bankruptcy procedures boost rates of entrepreneurship: reduce the cost of failure, and people become more willing to take risks. America’s business environment is much more dynamic than that of Europe or Japan, for many reasons—and our generosity to capitalism’s losers is one of them…
Constitutional Amendment to Prevent Moral Hazard:
From the chat board at calculated risk (sorry can’t find the link):
“We can solve the systemic regulator question and the too big to fail issue with one simple, two sentence constitutional amendment:
All non-public enterprises, regardless of their asset size, potential for systemic risk, or inter-creditor relationships, shall forever remain non-public. The government shall never provide debt or equity funds for any reason to non-public enterprise.
These two sentences would prevent any moral hazard violation and the market would take care of itself.”
One of the features that has enabled the bureaucratic abuse of the public during the past year has been the frantic, if temporary, flight-to-safety by investors. The Treasury has issued an enormous volume of debt into the frightened hands of investors seeking default-free securities. This has allowed the Treasury to finance a massive and largely needless transfer of wealth to bank bondholders so easily over the short-term that the longer-term cost has been almost completely obscured. But by transferring wealth from those who did not finance reckless loans to those who did – providing monetary compensation without economic production – the bureaucrats at the Treasury and Federal Reserve have crowded out more than a trillion dollars of gross investment that would have otherwise have been made by responsible people in the coming years, shifted assets to the control of those who have proven themselves to be irresponsible destroyers of capital, and have planted the seeds of inflation that will cut short any emerging recovery…
The bottom line is that the attempt to save bank bondholders from losses – to provide monetary compensation without economic production – is not sound economic policy but is instead a grand monetary experiment that has never been tried in the developed world except in Germany circa 1921. This policy can only have one of two effects: either it will crowd out over $1 trillion of gross domestic investment that would otherwise have occurred if the appropriate losses had been wiped off the ledger (instead of making bank bondholders whole), or it will result in a stunning and durable increase in the quantity of base money, which will ultimately be accompanied not by a year or two of 5-6% inflation, but most probably by a near-doubling of the U.S. price level over the next decade. As I’ve noted previously, the growth rate of government spending is better correlated with subsequent inflation than even growth in money supply itself, particularly at 4-year intervals. Regardless of near-term deflation pressures from a continued mortgage crisis, our present course is consistent with double digit inflation once any incipient recovery emerges.
For most consumers, one’s house is one’s biggest source of wealth. Economists have demonstrated that a loss of wealth leads to cuts in spending–from psychology and necessity. A 50%+ drop in home equity is one whopping-big loss of wealth. And it will have a lasting impact on consumer spending.

Japan beware, crashes have a habit of bringing regime change.
Et tu Tokyo? If Washington is counting on Japan to act as last-resort buyer of US dollar bonds, it may have to think again. Masaharu Nakagawa, finance chief of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), told the BBC that his country should not purchase any more US debt unless issued in yen as “Samurai” bonds, akin to “Carter bonds” in 1978.